![cisco asa 5505 replacement cisco asa 5505 replacement](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3iOLiCbQXHU/hqdefault.jpg)
![cisco asa 5505 replacement cisco asa 5505 replacement](https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1Tw_TKkKWBuNjy1zjq6AOypXa4/UpBright-48V-AC-DC-Adapter-For-Cisco-AD10048P3-ASA-5505-341-0183-01-341-0183-02.jpg)
- CISCO ASA 5505 REPLACEMENT INSTALL
- CISCO ASA 5505 REPLACEMENT CODE
- CISCO ASA 5505 REPLACEMENT SERIES
The latest FTD code for these devices is FTD 6.3 and 6.4. They are very similar to the Firepower devices that we all know and use today, but they are going to be replacements for some of the models we are currently used to.
CISCO ASA 5505 REPLACEMENT SERIES
This week at Cisco Live, I was fortunate enough to be able to see the new Firepower 1000 Series NGFW line of devices. Introducing the Firepower 1000 Series NGFW Line The feedback was taken very seriously and the switchport functionality that people were looking for is coming back. Now I needed a dedicated switch (with PoE for my access points) to go with my new 5506-X firewall.Įssentially, what Cisco did now with their latest series of firewalls, shown this week at Cisco Live, was give the people what they asked for. I have multiple branch offices with ~5 employees that worked just fine off of an ASA 5505 in the past because of the included switching capability and power over ethernet (PoE). There were similar opinions coming from a lot of people, myself included. Waat? ditched the switch ports on the ASA5506? I'm baffled! Who needs a 5506 with 8 routed ports? You would then be able to test all 3 of the tunnel types to find out which option suits your administrative needs.Cisco ASA 5506-X great piece of hardware, but I'm so frustrated that the 'switchport'/vlan functionality from the 5505 is gone. With an XG to XG VPN tunnel, you have similar default IPsec policies to utilize, and also have 2 other tunnel options (RED and SSL) instead of IPsec since they are both XG's. It may not be worth the time of troubleshooting if the tunnel migration between the ASA and the XG do not go smoothly, since you are going to completely migrate both sites anyways. You would be able to leave the existing Cisco ASA tunnel in place, while you worked on the configuration and migration of the XGs and getting them setup to test. If you can schedule enough downtime on the weekend, I would instead recommend doing a complete XG to XG migration. In regards to your migration, I would actually suggest a different approach to this.
CISCO ASA 5505 REPLACEMENT INSTALL
I figure I'll start with the small office during the work week, get the XG 115 setup there, recreate the site-to-site VPN between the two locations so backups can then occur again, and then over the weekend, I'll use the experience I gained from the XG 115 install to do the XG 210 in our main office.ġ) Does this sound like a reasonable migration plan?Ģ) Are there any issues (or guides) to setting up a site-to-site IPSEC VPN between Sophos XG and Cisco ASA 5505? I'm looking for suggestions on deployment. I have a bigger concern about backup replication to the remote office so want to minimize the downtime of the site-to-site VPN. I can have some flexibility with our small office because I can just let staff know to work in the main office during the migration. Initially, I just want to replicate what the ASAs are doing and then I'll expand into the additional features of the XG firewalls as I learn more about their capabilities. I have purchased an XG 210 for the main office and an XG 115 for the small office. Firewall policies on the ASA's are pretty straightforward. Our main office is 45 staff while our smaller office has limited personnel use (sporadically occupied during week) and serves as our backup DR site. I have two offices, both with Cisco ASA 5505 firewalls with a VPN linking the two offices.